MISCLASSIFIED
MILKY WAY
|
[HCD2009] 94a | IRAS - | GSC2.4.2 S99R175187 | AAVSO - |
SIMBAD SOPS IV e-94 | Pan-STARRS - | SAO - | VSX 809136 |
GAIA DR3 6083700267196631424 | SkyMapper 132601.60-473305.7 | WRAY - | GCVS - |
2MASS J13260158-4733060 | HIP - | Hen - | BD - |
WISE J132601.58-473306.0 | TYC - | ESO - | HD - |
Bidelman (1954) | - | Allen (1984) | - | Belzcyński et al. (2001) | - |
Gaposchkin (1957) | - | Kenyon (1986) | - | Akras et al. (2019) | - |
Boyarchuk (1969) | - | Vaidis (1988, 1991) | - |
Right ascension (°) | 201.5066Ref | Parallax (mas) | 0.291±0.028Ref | Reddening E(B-V) (mag) | 0.12±0.0Ref, Note |
Declination (°) | -47.5517Ref | Distance (kpc) | 3.19Ref, Note, 3.05Ref, Note | ||
Galactic longitude (°) | 308.9598Ref | Proper motion in α (mas/yr) | -3.15±0.02Ref | ||
Galactic latitude (°) | 14.9148Ref | Proper motion in δ (mas/yr) | -6.63±0.02Ref |
Proposed as the first symbiotic star in a globular cluster, Henleywillis et al. (2018) based their assertion on observed X-ray emission. However, Belloni et al. (2020) countered this proposition, arguing that there is a superposition of two unrelated objects within the cluster - an X-ray source and a carbon giant. The carbon giant does not exhibit any emission lines in its spectra, challenging its classification as a symbiotic star.